How to Use AI Responsibly EVERY Time
To ensure that AI serves as a valuable tool rather than a potential hazard, it's not only crucial to adopt a framework for responsible use, but acknowledge the key role we play as the users of that technology.
At ICMS, we encourage the positive contributions of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and promote their ethical use in learning and teaching. In line with this vision, we have developed a comprehensive approach to guide the responsible and effective institution-wide integration of AI.
Inappropriate use of AI may lead to breaches of academic integrity, including plagiarism, fabrication or falsification of content, collusion, contract cheating, or fraud etc. This misconduct may occur under the following circumstances:
Refer to the Academic Integrity Policy and Academic Integrity Procedures for details.
The flow chart below assists you to understand the referencing requirements when using AI tools and how to avoid academic misconduct.
Below are instances where the application of generative AI may be deemed appropriate and is designed into assessments (not limited to):
Approved by lecturer
• If it is instructed in the assessment brief that AI tool(s) is permitted or requested with appropriate acknowledgement;
For revision & learning
For refining the writing
If referenced and acknowledged
For ELICOS students
AI should not be used to create assessment answers if it is clearly instructed in the assessment brief that it is not permitted.
Not permitted or used in a way it is not allowed
If the assessment brief explicitly states that the use of AI is not allowed for a specific assessment, and a student disregards this instruction and still utilises it, it is considered academic misconduct;
Writing the assessments, code, or creating artwork
Doing research for the assessments
AI materials are not declared
For ELICOS students
Reminder: Check your Assessment brief in your Moodle subject site for detailed instructions.
It is essential for a student to include a declaration that provides an explanation of what AI tools, if any, have been used to generate material in the assessment. In these situations, the student should include a declaration which:
You can download the AI Declaration Form from the ‘Assessment Information’ section on Moodle.
See one example below.
I acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (https://chat.openai.com/) to generate materials for background research and self-study in the drafting of this assessment. I entered the following prompts on DD/MM/YYYY:
‘Write a 50-word summary about XXXXX. Write it in an academic style. Add references and quotations from XXXXXX.’
The output from the generative AI was adapted and modified for the final response
Fore more information and examples please check your Style Guide on Moodle.
APA Journals has policies on the use of generative AI in scholarly materials: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/publishing-policies?tab=3.
These guidelines are for authors submitting their work to APA scholarly publications. The new guidance is as follows:
‘For this policy, AI refers to generative LLM AI tools and does not include grammar-checking software, citation software, or plagiarism detectors.
ICMS recommend following the recommendation from APA Style (7th edition) on how to cite ChatGPT: https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt
Basic format:
Company. (Year). Name/Title (Version) [Type]. URL
See one example below.
When prompted with “Is the left-brain right brain divide real or a metaphor?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that although the two brain hemispheres are somewhat specialized, “the notation that people can be characterized as ‘left-brained’ or ‘right-brained’ is considered to be an oversimplification and a popular myth” (OpenAI, 2023).
Reference
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
Fore more information and examples please check your Style Guide on Moodle.
NOTE: ICMS is currently phasing in updated assessment briefs that explicitly state whether AI use is permitted. Until these updates are fully implemented, students should check with their lecturer before using AI tools for their assessments.